Off the bat, the case on the Angler is a way more sturdy canvas than Profoto. However on the finish of the day, it’s a case. Who cares?
Subsequent, the grid. I selected the version of the softbox from B&H that came with a grid. What this does is focuses and controls the sunshine a bit of bit extra. Price noting: the Profoto Clic doesn’t even have the power so as to add a grid. There’s no velcro across the edges. That’s a pleasant characteristic I used to be impressed with.
On the Angler, you even have a bit of velcro strap that can assist you put the softbox away properly. It’s a small creature consolation, however at a less expensive worth than Profoto, that’s an enormous leg up.
Now we get into the construction of it. I’ll inform you the handles are completely different. The Profoto has texture on their deal with, the Angler doesn’t. The deal with of the Angler Softbox is what you’ll anticipate – fundamental PVC-style plastic. They each look like fabricated from the identical sort of fabric, so there’s no building high quality distinction. If something, the Angler feels a bit bigger. For my fingers, the Angler feels a bit higher, however that’s actually subjective.
The locking, launch and tilting mechanisms are precisely the identical on each merchandise. It’s fairly easy; twist to lock on to your mild stand, and there’s a set off to tilt the softbox forwards and backwards.
Across the fringe of the Angler FastBox you have got velcro, to connect the grid. I hate to say it, however this can be a higher design for within the area as a result of it lets you have extra versatility in how you employ the product.